Currently there may be errors shown on top of a page, because of a missing Wiki update (PHP version and extension DPL3).
Navigation
Topics Help • Register • News • History • How to • Sequences statistics • Template prototypes

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Riesel 2 Missing-range"

From Prime-Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Odd values in that table)
 
(Re)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Questionable values in table ==
 
== Questionable values in table ==
 
 
My understanding of this table is that it shows cases where the Max prime is greater than the Max {{Vn}}-value searched. However, there seem to be some weird values in there, such as k = 17467, 15373, and 17411, where the "Max prime" is far less than the "Max n" column. Is it something to do with the multi-reservation, perhaps? [[User:NumberMX|NumberMX]] ([[User talk:NumberMX|talk]]) 05:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 
My understanding of this table is that it shows cases where the Max prime is greater than the Max {{Vn}}-value searched. However, there seem to be some weird values in there, such as k = 17467, 15373, and 17411, where the "Max prime" is far less than the "Max n" column. Is it something to do with the multi-reservation, perhaps? [[User:NumberMX|NumberMX]] ([[User talk:NumberMX|talk]]) 05:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 +
:The {{Vk}}-values in this category all got only a missing range, not a missing prime, so there could be values without any prime but missing testranges. {{Vk}}=17467 for example is tested upto {{Vn}}=325000 by now and further tested for 400000<{{Vn}}<2000000, so the range 325000<{{Vn}}<400000 is still missing. [[User:Karbon|Karbon]] ([[User talk:Karbon|talk]]) 22:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:33, 7 November 2020

Questionable values in table

My understanding of this table is that it shows cases where the Max prime is greater than the Max n-value searched. However, there seem to be some weird values in there, such as k = 17467, 15373, and 17411, where the "Max prime" is far less than the "Max n" column. Is it something to do with the multi-reservation, perhaps? NumberMX (talk) 05:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The k-values in this category all got only a missing range, not a missing prime, so there could be values without any prime but missing testranges. k=17467 for example is tested upto n=325000 by now and further tested for 400000<n<2000000, so the range 325000<n<400000 is still missing. Karbon (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)